Mohammadu Buhari
By 2015, Nigeria would have had 16 uninterrupted years of democracy. In our 54 years of Independence, the Fourth Republic has turned out to be the longest period of civilian rule without military intervention. The First Republic, which ended in acrimony, triggered the first violent coup that almost wiped out an entire generation of Nigerian leaders. The Second Republic lasted only four years and three months.
By 2015, Nigeria would have had 16 uninterrupted years of democracy. In our 54 years of Independence, the Fourth Republic has turned out to be the longest period of civilian rule without military intervention. The First Republic, which ended in acrimony, triggered the first violent coup that almost wiped out an entire generation of Nigerian leaders. The Second Republic lasted only four years and three months.
The Second Republic, headed by former
President Shehu Shagari, has been adjudged as one of the most profligate
in Nigeria’s history. After the collapse of the two republics, the
military regimes of Ibrahim Babangida and the late Sani Abacha began a
transition process that was to usher in democracy. Both attempts almost
pushed Nigeria to the brink of disintegration as the two leaders schemed
to perpetuate themselves in power.
Both the Babangida and Abacha years are still
regarded as the darkest periods in Nigerian history. The brutality of
the military era was unprecedented. That the Fourth Republic has endured
– good or bad – is a testimony that Nigerians are sworn never to return
to the years when Nigeria became a Pariah state under military
dictatorship. Today, our country is still living the consequences of
military incursion into governance.
While the Fourth Republic has not brought
the desired change, Nigerians still believe that the worst form of
democracy is better than the best of military rule. In spite of our
country’s many travails, every election cycle presents an opportunity to
deepen democracy and vote in the right leaders that will bring change
to a beleaguered people. In 2015, Nigerians are looking forward to
electing leaders who will serve the interest of the common good. As the date draws nearer, it has become imperative to begin a critical assessment of those who aspire to lead us.
A look at the presidential field reveals
no surprises. The prospective candidates for the Presidency are still
the same serial candidates we have known in the Fourth Republic. Really,
what will these individuals do differently? What transformational
blueprint do they have for the present and future of our country? At the
moment, apart from the incumbent President Goodluck Jonathan who is
being goaded into running for a second term, those who aspire to
challenge him are those we have known like the palm of our hands. Maj.
Gen. Muhammadu Buhari (retd.) is a former military head of state.
That
was 30 years ago. Atiku Abubakar, a former vice-president under former
President Olusegun Obasanjo, has switched parties on few occasions in
order to realise his presidential ambition. Rabiu Kwankwaso is the
governor of Kano State. A host of other candidates are not front runners. The dearth of candidates makes me really worried.
How come that in a country of 170 million
people, we can only boast two major presidential candidates? Apart from
these known contenders, are there no other capable Nigerians who can
vie for the Presidency? Why are the political parties so lacking of
quality candidates? Indeed, the current political climate that continues
to produce the same candidates every election cycle is the root of
leadership crisis in our country? Where are Nigerians that have proved
themselves in their chosen fields? Why are they not throwing their hats
into the ring? Why are the parties not looking beyond these men? This
digression is necessary because it paints a sad picture of what is wrong
with our brand of democracy. While it is within the rights of Buhari
and others to seek elective positions as citizens, the democratic space
needs to be more inclusive. There is no doubt that Buhari is a
distinguished Nigerian as a former number one citizen. As a military
ruler, he was known for his no-nonsense approach.
He initiated a
campaign against indiscipline known as the War Against Indiscipline. To
his credit,
Buhari is perhaps the only Nigerian ruler whose name has not been
directly linked to any corruption scandal. Those who yearn for his
return are fanatical about his famed incorruptibility. They look forward
to a Spartan president who would cut down on the excesses of Nigerians
who are given to ostentatious living. But Buhari has also been
criticised for being an autocratic ruler who moved to silence critics of
his administration by passing decrees curbing press freedom and
allowing for opponents to be detained up to three months without formal
charges
Those who support Buhari’s candidacy
point to his Spartan lifestyle. He is said to live in a bungalow. But
over the years, Buhari’s detractors have tried to paint him as a
religious bigot. They claim he is a religious extremist who hates
Christians. While these allegations have not been substantiated by
anyone, they have rubbed off on some Nigerians’ perception of him. His
supporters have explained away the allegations as the handiwork of those
who are afraid of another Buhari rule. He is believed to be very angry
about widespread corruption.
The Nigerian elite are said to be
uncomfortable with Buhari because he would ensure those found corrupt
are jailed just as he did to Second Republic politicians. In recent
years too, Buhari’s public statements in which he is alleged to have
alluded to violence if the election of 2011 was rigged have been used
against him by his opponents.
His critics alleged his statement
“fuelled” the violence that erupted in the North after the 2011
elections. Only recently, an attempt was made on his life by yet to be
identified terrorists. The attack prompted Nigerians to question who
wants Buhari dead less than a year to an election in which he is a
likely candidate. While Buhari’s anti-corruption credentials are not in
doubt, I still have my reservations about his candidacy. For one, Buhari
has been around for too long-both as head of state and as a
presidential candidate.
Buhari last ruled the country 30 years
ago. By 2015, he will be 73 years old. Is age still on his side? There
comes a time when leaders have to call it quits with public life. I
think Buhari’s generation should be taking a deserved rest by now. This,
of course, is debatable. Remarkably, even with all the attempts to
demonise him, he remains a true Nigerian committed to a better life for
the masses. But I am not sure if he should be the presidential candidate
of the All Progressives Congress in 2015. I will prefer a mentoring
role for him.
However, let’s even moot the possibility
of a Buhari presidency. What if he contests and wins? Will his
presidency translate into a radical transformation of Nigeria? Indeed,
his anti-corruption credentials as a president will be an asset. But, I
see obstacles on his way. First, Nigeria has changed since he last
governed the country as a military ruler by fiat. That will not happen
in a democracy. As president, he will still inherit the same broken
institutions that have made the Fourth Republic so far unproductive.
He
will need to deal with politicians and a National Assembly that is
self-destructive. Does Buhari have the temperance to survive in a
political climate where compromise and intrigues are the ingredients of
governance? Can Buhari change Nigeria?
Source- Punch Newspaper
No comments:
Post a Comment