Joe Fortemose Chinakwe, the man who named his dog after President Muhammadu Buhari is right now probably regretting his decision to honour his dog with the name of a man he considers his hero. He has been accused of trying to incite hate and breach the public peace. He has been arrested and re-arrested by the police and taken to a magistrate court, which promptly remanded him in prison until he is able to meet the conditions of his bail.
He has spent days in prison custody unable to raise the N50, 000 that he
has been asked to pay. His family members have only so far managed to raise
N20, 000. Even if he succeeds in putting
that sum together, his life is still in danger because aggrieved persons in his
neighbourhood, including a man who says he was trying to ridicule his father,
have threatened to kill him, if he shows up. The police are not investigating
this threat, but they seem so excited about dealing with the poor trader called
Joe, for having the effrontery to name his dog, Buhari.
To protect himself, Joseph has allegedly put the dog to sleep, or thrown
it away or whatever, in the hope that once the evidence is destroyed there will
be no case against him. It is all so
pitiable. Public opinion appears to be divided as to the nature and seriousness
of Joseph Chinakwe’s alleged felony, with some people arguing that it is
definitely an act of provocation and incitement for him to label his dog,
Buhari so boldly and to parade the same dog in a neighbourhood where there are
many residents of Northern extraction, whose feelings may be injured or who may
perceive that he is trying to make a political statement.
Those who want him punished have therefore dismissed
Chinakwe’s protestation that he is an admirer of the President, or that he
means well. His defenders insist that he is entitled to free speech and there
is nowhere in the statutes where a man can be punished on the basis of the
perception that some people’s feelings may be injured, and hence, be prompted
to commit murder. The law is not structured that way.
We are dealing, therefore with ethnic hate at the lunatic fringe.
Nigerians have become so suspicious of one another, and inter-ethnic
relationship is so poisonous that even the littlest innocent gesture could
result in mayhem. This is why many have been killed for allegedly committing
blasphemy or for insulting the religious sensibilities of some people. Remember
the woman who was killed by her students for allegedly desecrating the Quoran.
Remember Gideon Akaluka. Remember the woman who was recently beheaded in Abuja
for daring to preach the Christian gospel. We are also dealing with disregard
for human freedom, and Nigeria’s slip into a tragic season of intolerance. Why
shouldn’t Chinakwe call his dog whatever name catches his fancy? Well, may be he should have chosen an Igbo
name? But if we want national unity, why shouldn’t he take a name he admires
from another part of the country?
Ali Baba, the ace comedian, like many others, has come out strongly in
defence of Chinakwe saying he actually has a dog in his house named OBJ, and
that is quite direct because only one man bears that sobriquet in this country,
and neither OBJ nor his kinsmen have asked Atuyota to leave Yorubaland. One of
the most famous pictures online is that of a goat named Goodluck Jonathan, with
the name written on both flanks of it.
President Jonathan’s wife was also once (July 2013) referred to as
“shepopotamus” by Nobel Laureate Wole Soyinka, and before our very eyes, President
Olusegun Obasanjo, donated, to a conservation sanctuary, a chimpanzee, which he
named Patience to make a point obviously.
The parody at the time was unmistakable. We
all drew humour from all of that. What we seem to be dealing with right now,
however, is the absurd deification of a name on ethnic and partisan grounds. It
is curious that the Nigeria Police is devoting to the trial of Chinakwe, a
feverish amount of energy that we have not witnessed with regard to more
statutorily relevant offences. This hullaballoo over the giving of a dog a name
that has led to its hanging and the likely punishment of its owner is one
distraction too many. We are above all else, dealing with a storm in a tea cup,
occasioned by a culture shock, and our underdeveloped understanding of the relationship
between man and animals.
Chinakwe says he chose the name Buhari out of admiration. And he may
well be right, and he would have been right, and there would have been no
problem if he was living in Europe or North America. But he lives in a country
where animals have no rights and no recognition other than as victims of human
predators, and a dog in our culture is to be treated as an instrument or as
meat for the soup pot. Elsewhere, a dog has earned its reputation in mythology
and actuality, as a man’s best friend. The root of this is that a dog is
considered the most beloved, the most loyal and the most dependable of all
animals. People use dogs to guard their homes, to keep away intruders, even to
play with children and as companions in the home. There are many stories and
legends about the loyalty of dogs. Hawkeye is the name of a famous dog who lay
next to the casket of its owner who died in active service as a US Navy SEAL.
There
is a film, “Hachi, a dog’s tale,” starring Richard Gere, about Hachiko, a dog
who greeted his owner at the train station everyday and after the owner died,
the dog went to the same station for nine years. Recently, I posted on instagram
the picture of a dog in Santa Catarina, Brazil, Negao the dog, whose owner died
eight months earlier and the dog remained outside the hospital awaiting his
owner’s return. In the United States, a
police dog has been given a state burial, draped with national colours in
appreciation of its loyal and meritorious service to the nation. Many centuries
ago, Homer wrote in Odyssey, about a
loyal dog, Argos who waited for Odysseus until he returned.
The established normal is that a dog can be trusted more than a human
being. And this is why in other parts of
the world, when people name their dogs after celebrities, they are actually
paying compliments and showing respect.
World figures like Elvis Presley, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Louis Vuitton,
Mandela, Clinton, J. F. Kennedy and others have had their names given to either
cats or dogs, and it is no big deal. Admirers transpose their feelings from man
to animal. Joseph Chinakwe may actually be saying that President Buhari is a
loyal, trustworthy, supportive, dependable and companionable Guardian of the
Nigerian estate. It would have been a different thing perhaps if he had given
that name to a tortoise, a rat, cat, a fox, or a chimpanzee. But in a country
where every animal is considered a prey or a lower, spiteful creature, using
the metaphor of a dog could be risky as the Chinakwe case has shown. In Nigeria,
we treat animals badly, and we don’t consider anyone a friend, man or animal. We
are vengeful, mean and suspicious. We are so scared we are even afraid of
domestic and domesticated animals.
In other societies, animals are treated with greater respect and in the
United States for example, the life of a dog is far superior to that of a human
being in Nigeria. I have written about
this twice: In “A Dog’s Life” (1996), I reflected on the life of a dog owned by
Stanley Meisler (God bless his soul) and his wife, Elizabeth Fox, my hosts
during my journalism programme at the University of Maryland, College Park,
United States (1996 -97). I was shocked that the dog had a room of its own, a
proper room, not a kernel, and whenever that dog fell ill, we took him to a dog
hospital and Stanley bought drugs. I saw
that dog living the life of a king, better catered for than many Africans.
I wrote another piece titled “A Hotel for Dogs” (July 23, 2006) about a
five-star hotel in Bethesda, Washington, which attends to dogs as customers,
and where dogs enjoy a life of luxury. Established in 2003, by PetSmart Inc.,
by 2006, there were 32 hotels of its type in the United States and the then
spokesman of the group, Bruce Richardson, had boasted that by 2010, the plan
was to have 240 such hotels across the United States. We are talking luxury, 23
USD per night, 33USD for a dog suite, as at that time, all pre-tax, plus
provisions for pooch ice cream. In
general, Americans spend about $40 billion dollars a year on household pets. I
guess that is more than Nigeria’s annual budget even by today’s relative
standards.
And so, what are we talking about? An American dog is a big man in
Nigeria by all standards. But because we eat dogs and treat all animals badly
in this country, in fact we have no regard for human beings (consider the
hundreds that get killed, raped, kidnapped daily and nobody cares), we are
bound to be incensed that anyone would name a dog after a deified political figure. Joe Chinakwe’s sins should be forgiven,
albeit there is no morality in law, but the Nigerian judiciary should not
expose itself to further ridicule by lending the weight of the law to such partisan
trash that makes no sense. There are far more important issues requiring
serious attention in this country today.
But
in case nobody understands that and Mr Chinakwe and his counsel find themselves
in a tight corner, they should put out a disclaimer and say their dog, living
or dead, is filing for a change of name. That is perfectly within their rights
to do. And should they find themselves in any other difficult situation, they
have my full permission to rename the dog, Reuben Abati. But should you, dear
reader consider this a bad name you wish to hang, you also have my full support,
partnership and friendship to offer your own name.
If that will put an end to this
circus over the name of a dog, and set Joseph Chinakwe free, and also remind us
that we are in a democracy, please, help and so be it. By the way, I hear
Chinakwe and his sympathisers finally managed, after a fund-raising appeal, to raise
a sum of N90, 000 to perfect his bail bond and that he is now out of detention.
Would somebody in a responsible position just put an end to this joke and let
us focus on serious issues?
No comments:
Post a Comment